It is very confusing for people who are of latin american heritage, and have a mixture of amerindian, european, and african descent.
First of all mexico is not central america, it is north america.
They should not have central american as a category, considering that they use the mestizo population as a reference panel. They should classify amerindian, asian, african, and european seperately. Many people are confused when they get their results and see central american, they think it means native american. Every dna company has it separate.
When going through the "Search Results" list you can double-click a name in the list to edit the record of the person you have selected. But as soon as you make changes to the record, the "Search Results" list suddenly closes and returns to the "All People" list. This is really not helpful if there are Multiple Results and you wish to update another record in the list. And each time it does this you have to go to the "All People" list, select "Search Results" and continue where you left off. But it shouldn't have returned to the "All People" list unless you had just finished updating the last person on the list and nothing remained. This is very annoying and I'm sure others have experienced this.
1. Please add some options to "Search for People" by their "Maiden Name", "Prefix" and "Suffix" as none exist.
2. Can you also add all of the facts that are currently missing in the list of available options - such as "Family Address".
3. And finally, an option to find details that "match the same case" (case sensitivity) would be greatly appreciated. It would be very helpful to filter the results as anything you enter in "Place", "Description" or "Cause of death" cannot be checked to see if they match exactly as you entered - since the option to "match the same case" does not currently exist and often returns search results that are sometimes too large to be of any real use.
The Search for People function is a valuable asset to Family Tree Builder but it would be a lot more useful if some of the extras I made mention were added to an "Advanced" tab at the top of the window (next to the "Basic" tab that's currently there).
I recently got my estimate, and I read the description of Nigeria and it's incorrect. The biggest tribes are Yoruba, Igbo, and Hausa. My husband is Nigerian and Yoruba. Esan is mainly in Benin. It would be nice for accuracy.
I would like to see a better explamation of what is causing the "error" when I try to generate a book. The generic error message does not help me to fix whatever is causing the system to be unable to generate a Family Book.
Hello I recently updated to FTB v8 and since then I have noticed that Windows looses focus now. I ran a tool to check when focus is taken and it detected that FamilyTreePublisher.exe (version 184.108.40.20672 date 19/01/2017) had stolen focus.
A temporary fix is to disable "MyHeritage Family Tree Builder check for updates" (aka FTBCheckUpdates.exe) from Windows startup (via msconfig). Why one needs to check for updates so often, I don't know.
When you click on a person on a tree it lists 'Facts' including marriage, births of children, death of child etc. Each of those offer hotlinks to the children or spouses invloved. This is very useful on large trees. Could you please look at including hotlinks to parents as well, maybe in the birth box, as it would save time in particularly large families. Thx.
The pedigree view you currently have is important for seeing more than the direct lines; however, it is equally important and more efficient to see a horizontal chart with direct ancestors of your matches. The ability to see that first and then go to the chart as you currently have can speed up the hunt for a common ancestor. It saves much time.
I would love to see a filtering system for smart matches similar to what we have for PedigreeMap. In PedigreeMap, we can select a person of interest and the filter by their "Extended Family", "Immediate Family", "Ancestors" or "Descendants". This would be incredibly useful for Smart Matches and Record Matches as well. If I'm currently focusing on a particular portion of my family tree, it would be great to see all the smart matches which are relevant only to that section (without having to check the matches for each person individually).
Source Citations matched through Record Matches populates on an individual's profile page. This clutters the profile and would be more helpful if an option was created to match the citation to single or multiple events (i.e. birth, marriage, death, etc).
The Tree Consistency Checker report is FANTASTIC. I would like to see something similar for Smart Matches and Record Matches. What I am envisioning is a report which reviews all of the Confirmed matches and identifies those which are inconsistent with your tree. For example:
Birth Year differs by more than 10 years (possibly merging a parent and their similarly named child)
John J Smith was born in 1874 in your tree, but in 1861 in a confirmed match with Bill Jones' tree
Mary Smith is the daughter of Tom Smith and Ellen Smith (born Frank), but the daughter of Tom Smith and Mary Smith Sr (born Collins) in a confirmed match with Frank Smith's tree
This would be helpful for identifying any of the following situations:
You have a single person in your tree who is matched to two different (but very similarly named people) in other trees
You approved a match based on consistent data but have since made changes to your tree based on new records and the match is no longer consistent
You approved a match based on consistent data, but the person whose tree you matched with has since made changes to their tree based on new records and the match is no longer consistent.
Smart Matches and Record Matches are WONDERFUL, but they can also be very overwhelming especially when your tree gets large. I would like the ability to either hide (or approve en masse) all matches where there there is no new/different information between my tree and the matched information. This way, I can focus my attention only on those matches where there are "New", "Improved" or "Different" pieces of data that I want to do something with.
I commonly see cases where I'll add a person to my tree and get 50 smart matches. Once I've reviewed, approved and copied over the data from the first 2-3 of them which are true matches, then the other 47 are all redundant and it is tedious to go through and approve them all.
Venho por este meio fazer 2 sugestões que me parecem uteis.
- Tenho 2 irmãos casados com 2 irmãs e não existe forma de as ligar, obrigando a repetir a irformação de um dos irmãos, da cunhada e dos descendentes no ramo familiar delas.
- Quando há divórcios, poderiam colocar uma opção para sinalizar se o cônjuge retirou o nome de casada ou não, permitindo construir o nome de forma correta e não perdendo a informação dos nomes de solteira e casada.
Agredecendo desde já a atenção dispensada, cumprimentos
Finding location logic a bit strange, i.e. Bedford, Cape Province, South Africa, finds a Texas location, Google finds this location correctly. Logic seems to look for street address first, as if it cannot find it seems to map elswhere even if the correct country exists. Lots of locations in historic documents no longer exist or have been renamed, generally the country names are constant, so logic should look at this first?
Now that you are offering DNA tests, it really would make much more sense to offer a horizontal pedigree view (i.e. descendants on the left, ancestors on the right instead of the bottom and the top of the screen) so that when I go to look at somebody else's tree, I can see their ancestral lines much easier. Currently it is usually the case that a match's ancestral lines are so far off the edge of the screen to the left and the right that it is essentially impossible to see their ancestral lines.
It is SO MUCH EASIER to view a pedigree horizontally rather than vertically when all you really want to see is the ancestral lines.
I made this same suggestion to Family Tree DNA previously, and they have now implemented it. Ancestry has always had the horizontal view available.
I have a tree design that I would like to propose.
I believe this will enhance the view for large families with several siblings. It reduces the horizontal length of siblings and spouses so that with one look, one may identify all the siblings and their spouses.
My design will have:
- all kids/siblings on one row horizontally
- then spouses of each sibling connected below with a line vertically (So the spouses ar all on one line)
- then each child from a specific spouse connects right directly to the
PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT.
Can this design be adopted? Who do I write to get this done? Or is it already a part of the options provided?