Looking for entry into Australia of John Lockyer Huntly. b.abt 1821 ? London d. 1907 Victoria Australia.
We know that he married Ellen Macdaniel where is unknow.
But I did find 6 births on the Victorian BDM first in 1854.
But form a recent located will there were more children mentioned.
John occupation appears to be engineer in Hawkesdale area of Victoria.
Anyone who has a connection to this family would be interested in hearing from.
I'm new to this website and would love to find any information on my Great Grandpa Earl James Soelberg. I'm taking a family hisotry class where I have to find information on an ancestor. He was born in Mantua, Box Elder, Utah in september 26, 1892 and married Exie Alberta Singley. I'm not sure how to really find any information on him on this website. Thank you so much!
I am looking for the parents of my great grandmother - SUSAN CARD. She was born in Milk River, Clarendon, Jamaica aound 1887 and died August 1972. She had a sister - ELLEN CARD who married and was known as ELLEN FORBES. Susan's children include Rosetta, Zechariah, Reuben, Maybell, Nathanuel and Jonathon. Her spouse was Samuel Thompson. Please contact me ( Latoya Williams ) at firstname.lastname@example.org.
That is the link to the photgraph of the death certificate.
Need advice. In the 1910 US census for Florida - Washington Co - Chipley - District 0121 - page 29, I can find my great grandmother Lena May Boyett as a 7 year old girl. My confusion is, she is listed as the daughter in law of the head of the household, John Harry Boyett. How can a single 7 year old be a daughter in law?
I suspect the recorder meant granddaughter, as the listing goes, John Harry Boyett, 56, head; Luela, 56, wife; John, 30, son, Martha R, 28, DIL, (John & Martha married 10 years with 4 kids,) and then 4 children; Maudie, 9, DIL; Lena, 7, DIL; Cleo, 3, DIL; and Ollie, 1, DIL. A 1 year old daughter in law?
Or, would they be step children? Of John Harry, or of John? I would assume if John and Martha R had been married 10 years and Maudie was 9, they would be the children of their marriage. But I dislike assuming,....
Am I correct in thinking these are granddaughters, and not daughter in laws?