Is it correct to sya "myherithe are undertaking" the billion ngraves project?
I would have thought thay MH are in support of an otheriwse structured porject.
Support for billion graves is one thing, but gee I hope MH are running it!!!
The billion graves project is a stunning idea and must not be "taken over" by a genealogical "house" based on a comercial orptimizatrion stratergy !!! Be that myheritge or the one and only infamous ancestry!!
Yeah, OK, they are "supporting" it rather than initiating it. Does it make any difference?
Here's the original e-mail about it:
Cemeteries are among the most valuable resources for family history research. Headstones (gravestones) contain a wealth of information about the deceased, such as dates of birth and death, names of relatives, and surprises such as photographs and emotional epitaphs.
There are hundreds of thousands of cemeteries worldwide, but most of them have never been documented, and the headstone information is not available online. Time is chipping away at the headstones and many become unreadable over the years :-(
Together with our partner, BillionGraves, we have recently launched a global initiative to photograph and transcribe all of the world's cemeteries, and make the data available for free!
This week we kickstarted this initiative by taking the employees of MyHeritage to "practice what we preach" and digitize an entire cemetery ourselves. We photographed more than 50,000 gravestones in a few hours in the largest project of this kind ever done in Israel. Read about our amazing experience and look at many photos documenting our project on our blog. Leading genealogy bloggers agree that this is a wonderful, worthy mission – read the posts of Randy Seaver and James Tanner about it.
We cannot do this important project alone. This is where YOU can make a big difference!
We extend an invitation to you to come join us in this exciting project.
How does it work?
1. BillionGraves is a very easy to use iPhone and Android app. First, click here to sign up to BillionGraves for free in its special MyHeritage welcome page.
2. Download the BillionGraves mobile app from that page.
3. Visit a cemetery near you, and take photos of the headstones using the app. GPS information on each grave is automatically captured.
4. Use the BillionGraves website to help enter the names and information that appear in the headstone photos that you took or other users have taken. All information is made available for free on the BillionGraves website and on MyHeritage SuperSearch. MyHeritage Record Matching technology will match the headstones automatically to your tree and all trees on MyHeritage, for free.
For more information, read our blog post. If you have questions about participating, email them to our team at firstname.lastname@example.org.
As part of the project, I photographed 2000 gravestones myself this month, and I must say it is fascinating and addictive. Join our global initiative too, by clicking here.
Founder & CEO
Steady on there Phillip, advancement in Geo tagging ihas to be the most interesting new attribute we should all adopt.
How would you see the geo tagging of a grave in a small counrty cemetery ( I am A crow Eater) and in particuler a burila without monumnet. Seems like a great idea but HOW do I 9 as the primary researcher) discover the location- the burial register (when accessable) give row and plot - but in some cemeteries you have to have Harrsion Ford with you to locate ANY path.
I would like others to explore your great idea adn I would hope that Myheritage- ses the value in getting onto this option without dely. But thet means getting the "tam" to agree-- not an easy task if they have a contra intention-- like setting up a fee nbased accesiblity Option anf make us pay.
I recently started using the smart match concensus available on the web page (didn't use it before because it took so long to see the page come up, but I now have faster broadband) and it is proving to be very useful - particularly the "ignore person" option for cutting down the 28,000 smart matches to be checked.
I see something happening frequently on the concensus page, for example, I get "Launceston, Cornwall, England, UK", "Launceston, Cornwall, England", "Launceston Cornwall England", "Launceston, Cornwall, ENG ", "Cornwall, England", "Cornwall, UK", "England", and "UK" as possible matches to addresses. Now obviously (to a human) these are all the same location. Would it be possible to program in a little check for close matches on addresses - particularly for different puctuation (e.g. "Launceston, Cornwall, England" and "Launceston Cornwall England") or abbreviated countries (e.g. "England" and "ENG") just to save users a bit of time?
The information that you already confirmed and copied to your tree online will be syncrhonised back to the tree on the Family Tree Builder. In other words, the data that was copied to inside your tree is synced.
It doesn't mean that the list of matches to confirmed or reject will be updated in the FTB, with those that you already worked on the site.
This happens because actually the Family Tree Builder and the site works independently and with different algorythms with the Smart Matches. Both, from each 'side', look for matches into a pool of profiles. It would look like something like so:
FTB <====> POOL OF PROFILES <=====> WEB
Therefore, I would recommend that you alway work on one of the platforms with the Smart Matches, and I suggest to work with them directly on the site, because the Enhanced Smart Matches technology is only available online. After you have confirmed and copied all the matches, you can then simply sync your tree on the FTB and all the information copied to the tree online will be synced back to your project on the FTB.
Im not sure if From place is needed. You can always assume that previous Move to place has that information and you can always use the Settlement to keep a Place too. I use Settlement to keep track of all Sources/Events between moves.
However it would be nice if the sorting was working in the WEB/FTB trees. In WEB tree Moves is sorted before Settlements instead of a Timeline. In FTB Move and Settlement can switch order when dates are the same.
I have various ancestors whose names were spelled a variety of ways - in official/primary sources no less. For instance Couchet/Cochet/Coché/Cousiee or Andriaenken/Adriaentje. It would be great if there were fields for these alternative spellings, which could then be taken into account when doing smart matches/research. (I used to put the alternative spelling in brackets, but in the cases where there are three or four, it becomes to cumbersome.
You can send a comment to the other site manager when rejecting a smart match, already. Just go to compare trees, go to bottom of page, send message, then go back to smart matches and reject the match. Have a great day!
I like the Smart match function a lot but very often, when I checked them, I see that I have already confirmed all of them. So, a visual indicator like the colour of the Smart Match Icon green for completely new and never confirmed SM, orange for some new and some already confirmed and red or grey for no new but already confirmed SM would be great
This is basically "copy or retype all the stuff from one card, and delete it", which is time-consuming. It would be so much better if a merge could be done, similar to what is done when comparing my tree and another tree - clicking on the "merge" button allows data to be copied from the other tree. In the case of duplicates, it would be great if there was a way to copy everything from one card (to be selected by the user) into the other card (also selected) using a similar merge page before deleting the duplicate card.
It's actually not copy and pasting; you simply can delete one of the duplicates and use the attach/detach feature of the FTB or site to connect the correct duplicate to the rest of the tree, if necessary.
Please, take a look on the comprehensive explanation of this functionality on the link below:
But what if you have some information (e.g. addresses, occupation, etc) in card #1 but not card #2, and have some information (e.g. place of death and education) in card #2 but not in card #1? The only way to get a full set on one card is to cut-and-paste, or retype.