I know that some might consider this suggestion a bit on the morbid side, but here in SA we often sit with families that are widely distributed through the country and there are a lot of movement of families between towns. This leads to people getting buried in one town but there might not any more direct relatives living in that particular town.
Should relatives wish to visit the grave site they first have to locate the exact cemetery and then spend a lot of time wandering through the cemetry looking for the correct grave and some times they end up not finding the grave they wished to visit or due to tombestone theft (yes, that actually happens here in SA) the grave has become unmarked.
I would like to suggest the addition of a grave GPS coordinate field to the form if the person has passed away. This will give family members the opportunity to mark the gravesite and other family members can then quickly locate graves in old cemetries.
With the availability of GPS technology in modern times and everybody having smartphones, this could also be feature for the mobile app, perhaps a "Geo-tagging" function where the coordinates can be taken at the grave site and uploaded to the family tree?
At the moment our family adds the GPS coords of a grave in the Biography section of a profile, but this field could be a valuable addition to the standard form.
I recently started using the smart match concensus available on the web page (didn't use it before because it took so long to see the page come up, but I now have faster broadband) and it is proving to be very useful - particularly the "ignore person" option for cutting down the 28,000 smart matches to be checked.
I see something happening frequently on the concensus page, for example, I get "Launceston, Cornwall, England, UK", "Launceston, Cornwall, England", "Launceston Cornwall England", "Launceston, Cornwall, ENG ", "Cornwall, England", "Cornwall, UK", "England", and "UK" as possible matches to addresses. Now obviously (to a human) these are all the same location. Would it be possible to program in a little check for close matches on addresses - particularly for different puctuation (e.g. "Launceston, Cornwall, England" and "Launceston Cornwall England") or abbreviated countries (e.g. "England" and "ENG") just to save users a bit of time?
The information that you already confirmed and copied to your tree online will be syncrhonised back to the tree on the Family Tree Builder. In other words, the data that was copied to inside your tree is synced.
It doesn't mean that the list of matches to confirmed or reject will be updated in the FTB, with those that you already worked on the site.
This happens because actually the Family Tree Builder and the site works independently and with different algorythms with the Smart Matches. Both, from each 'side', look for matches into a pool of profiles. It would look like something like so:
FTB <====> POOL OF PROFILES <=====> WEB
Therefore, I would recommend that you alway work on one of the platforms with the Smart Matches, and I suggest to work with them directly on the site, because the Enhanced Smart Matches technology is only available online. After you have confirmed and copied all the matches, you can then simply sync your tree on the FTB and all the information copied to the tree online will be synced back to your project on the FTB.
Im not sure if From place is needed. You can always assume that previous Move to place has that information and you can always use the Settlement to keep a Place too. I use Settlement to keep track of all Sources/Events between moves.
However it would be nice if the sorting was working in the WEB/FTB trees. In WEB tree Moves is sorted before Settlements instead of a Timeline. In FTB Move and Settlement can switch order when dates are the same.
I have various ancestors whose names were spelled a variety of ways - in official/primary sources no less. For instance Couchet/Cochet/Coché/Cousiee or Andriaenken/Adriaentje. It would be great if there were fields for these alternative spellings, which could then be taken into account when doing smart matches/research. (I used to put the alternative spelling in brackets, but in the cases where there are three or four, it becomes to cumbersome.
You can send a comment to the other site manager when rejecting a smart match, already. Just go to compare trees, go to bottom of page, send message, then go back to smart matches and reject the match. Have a great day!
I like the Smart match function a lot but very often, when I checked them, I see that I have already confirmed all of them. So, a visual indicator like the colour of the Smart Match Icon green for completely new and never confirmed SM, orange for some new and some already confirmed and red or grey for no new but already confirmed SM would be great
This is basically "copy or retype all the stuff from one card, and delete it", which is time-consuming. It would be so much better if a merge could be done, similar to what is done when comparing my tree and another tree - clicking on the "merge" button allows data to be copied from the other tree. In the case of duplicates, it would be great if there was a way to copy everything from one card (to be selected by the user) into the other card (also selected) using a similar merge page before deleting the duplicate card.
It's actually not copy and pasting; you simply can delete one of the duplicates and use the attach/detach feature of the FTB or site to connect the correct duplicate to the rest of the tree, if necessary.
Please, take a look on the comprehensive explanation of this functionality on the link below:
But what if you have some information (e.g. addresses, occupation, etc) in card #1 but not card #2, and have some information (e.g. place of death and education) in card #2 but not in card #1? The only way to get a full set on one card is to cut-and-paste, or retype.
Numera har de flesta ett antal namn som man fått vid dopet men man använder mestadels bara ett namn, eller ett sammansatt namn, tilltalsnamnet, eller ett smeknamn. Skulle det vara möjligt att i My Heritage kunna markera användarnamnet med exvis fetstil eller understrykning och att denna markering kunde vara användbar vid val i utskrifter och visningar i trädet, i stil med visning av efternamn för kvinnor. I mitt träd har jag valt att skriva en asterix (*) efter tilltalsnamnet men det är inget som påverkar visning i utskrifter eller släktträd och det är bara jag som vet vad det betyder. Det borde påverka sökfunktionen också. Mvh /Sven-Arvid/