When I see the list of "attributes" for a person on the consensus page the are many times when I can see that many of the suggestions are for another person because of the dates and/or relatives. I would like to click on one of those fields and get a page with only the records for that subset. This would allow me to confirm or deny all the records with a given set of dates or parents/wives etc.
We now have a new technology called "Record Detective™", It is the first technology of its kind to automatically extend the paper trail from a single historical record to other related records and family tree connections.
Record Detective™ generates new leads and discoveries by turning a single record into a door to more. For example, a record discovered in MyHeritage’s digital archive, SuperSearch, will now automatically include a summary of additional records and individuals in family trees relating to it, providing new information and clues to take your research to new directions.
Record Detective™ essentially turns historical records into smart objects that determine which people they are about, and it automatically conducts additional research about those people. Historical records are invaluable to everyone interested in their family history. With over 4 billion records available, MyHeritage provides a wealth of documents enabling you to make exciting discoveries.
You can learn more about any record or profile provided by the Record Detective™by hovering over its thumbnail. The summary will show a confidence score, ranging from a half star to five stars, indicating the likelihood that the historical record correctly belongs to the associated individual. Click the name of the record or person, which are links, to view them in more detail.
Hover the mouse on the record’s thumbnail to reveal a tooltip with a detailed summary of the record and the confidence score of this find according to the Record Detective™.
That feature has nothing to do with my suggestion concerning the SmartMatch Consensus page.
I oft times get 50 or 60 matches for one individule. The smartmatch function many times will try to match with 2 or more OBVISOULY different people. The birthdates are 50 years apart, the names of the parents are different etc.
I currently look to see whether there are more correct matches of more mismatches.
I then go through each entry and only confirm the good ones or deny the bad ones.
I then group deny or confirm all to take care of the rest.
If there are questionable matches then I must research them before I can continue.
If I could select the subset of records with the obviously wrong birth date or obviously wrong set of parents and deny them as a group, then select the subset with the obviously correct data and confirm them as a group then I could concentrate my research on the ones that are left.
This would increase my speed and accuracy and decrease my fustration and irritation with a function that needs LOTS of improvement.
Hi, I've tried working out how to do this and I can't so I post this in the hope that someone can advise me, or failing that to request it as a feature:
I know I can set up past events, e.g. military action at <place> on <date> for someone in my tree, but what I'd really like to do is enable that event as an anniversary event, similar to birthdays and wedding anniversaries. Obviously the 'floating balloons' image probably wouldn't be appropriate, but I'd like to be able to remind the family members who look at my tree that on date <X>, this relative was wounded in action, or killed in action, or whatever. Particularly with the 100th anniversary of the outbreak of WW1 less than a year away, I will have several such events to mark, and I'd like for people to get notice of those as and when they come up.
You can create an "event" in your website. Just click on the events > family events option. At the right upper side you need to click on the blue " create an event" option. There will not be any symbol next to the event placed and the members of your website will get a notice before the actual event.
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I tried using that method, and although it allows me to set up a family event, I can't set the year to be earlier than 2011 (obviously it's intended for arranging family reunions and the like). Not only that, but there's no option for making it a recurring event, in the way that a birthday or a wedding anniversary would naturally be.
In the calendar menu it looks as though I can in theory enable up death anniversaries - this might potentially work for the obvious situations, but unfortunately it's an 'all-or-none' option, and I wouldn't want anniversaries of recent deaths to be shown, for the obvious reason.
I think it would be a really useful feature if, when creating an event, there was a check box to tick if one required the specific event to be an annual anniversary.
Thank you for your posts here on the forum and for your suggestion.
This is a nice suggestion however this is somewhat impossible to do as what you wish pertains to a specific event in history and not directly to a person in your family tree.
The events are created for only people in a family tree as the system can use Birth/Wedding/Death dates etc in order to produce the event and then this can therefore become an annually recurring event within the calender producing reminders both in the family tree home page and within the family tree itself.
I don't really understand why this cannot be seen as a specific event for a specific person in my tree? Yes, it's historic but then so are his birth and marriage.
Obviously WW1, for example, is a world event, affecting millions of people in different ways. I don't wish to have an anniversary that is 'outbreak of WW1'. I am however able to define an event against a single person in my tree (e.g. my grandfather) which relates to a specific thing which happened to him, e.g. 'wounded in action'. That specific event is unique to him, in the same way that his birth and his marriage are. It is a personal event, which to my mind is worthy of marking annually. I wouldn't expect this to happen for all personal events, hence my suggestion of a check-box on the event.
And it gave me an idea for my blog: This Month in the Gray Family History. Each month, I could pick out three or four events and develop them a bit. Heck, I could do one a week for different family branches.
I'll have to check to see if there is some easy way to sort everything by date... back in a minute...
Timeline report is for a single individual. Guess if I did timelines for half a dozen key family members, i could pull from those. But might miss some fun stuff that way.
Aha, Custom Report. Darn, won't include any of my Custom Facts. Grrr. Still, once it's in my spreadsheet, I can easily find all instances of Nov. then pick and choose a few for the blog. Hmm, got to sort by each date field...
Not as easy as I'd like it to be, but still workable. Check the blog from time to time to see it when it's finished.
If a person comes in two different family tree and this person is linked together with a Smart Match (confirmed by both their parts) should be the person's profiles also merged. Everything I update about this person in my tree should be updated in all the trees where this person is.
Moreover, it should be possible to link all family trees on MyHeritage with Genis world tree or creating a world tree on MyHeritage.
Another missing feature is the ability to see how many blood relatives a person has. If the person has 13 blood relatives in the family tree, this should be written on their profile, as it's on Geni.
I love the "merge" capability when looking at matches with other trees, but I find that I end up spending a lot of time overtyping because some people (a) use all capitals, or (b) all lower case, or (c) some of each, both for names and addresses - there's about 6 or 7 common variations. I like everything in the same format. I think it would be easy to add a tool and/or an option to FTB so that the user could convert all entries of names, places, etc (separately) to the format they prefer. It would be a great facility that would save a lot of time.
One quick example is surname case. It is common (but not obligatory) to put the SURNAME in upper case. But apparently even professional genealogists haven't agreed on this. And I wouldn't necessarily want McNamarra to become MCNAMARRA or de Grays to become DE GRAYS or van der Meter to become VAN DER METER because it disguises the original spelling of the name.
When working with documents such a a Census it is sometimes hard to find the persons names. Once it is found, I like to mark it so other can see. Right now the best way is to mark a face. It would be better if you had an option to "Mark Location" instead. This way when you do a report, the name that you marked does not show up as a photo of the person.
There may have been similar requests for this in the past.
I like this "mark location on document" idea. Great suggestion!
It just occurs to me -- would the results be different if the census image were entered as a "Document" instead of as "Photo"? For the automatic importation, we don't have any control, and right now I can't separate the ones added automatically by the system from the ones I entered last year after I found them manually with SuperSearch or at another search site.
Sometimes it is possible to stretch a red box around the person's name, but sometimes it is the blue "face" box that cannot be resized. I can't figure quite how this works. Possibly for some of those documents I have turned off automatic face detection?
If you don't want the document to appear as a photo of the person, uncheck the box that says "Personal photo"