You've been a member for less than a year, so I doubt you have any great knowledge of the lack of effort on FTB's behalf ... I on the other hand have watched this fester for the last few years, and know for a fact that bug reports are ignored on a regular basis ...
BTW ... I'm also a member of Ancestry, for what that's worth ... irrelevant, since Ancestry runs a pretty clean bug free ship.
No program that requires so much in depth detail runs smoothly from the get go. This is why we release it and wait for feedback from our valued users like yourself and then we work closely with our development team to have these issues ironed out and fixed in as quick as possible time frame to reduce the users frustrations.
We are aware that FTBv7 has had a few problems yet the majority were unforseen and required the direct feedback of users. Since then a lot of bugs have been fixed to date and tweeked versions of FTBv7 have been released.
Please continue to provide us with feedback as again this is of most importance to us.
Please conact us at support@MyHeritage.com with any Technical concerns that you may have and we will be only too happy to help.
I would love to see a place below the "Buried at" line for the plot number.
I also find FindAGrave.com to be an important and essential source of information. Would love to see a place below the proposed plot line for the Find A Grave memorial number. It would also be nice if you clicked on that number in FTB it would open a browser tab and load that memorial for you. But, I guess that would be too much to ask for.
First of all, I love the MyHeritage site! I am really enjoying creating a county-wide family tree project for my local area. I know that the tree I am building is a little bit unusual and this request might not be something most people would utilize, but I hope it is something to consider for those who would find it very useful.
I could not find a way in the current site to limit photo tagging access. My request would be to add that as an option in "Site Settings" menu, in the “Content” section, on the “Permissions” tab.
The site I am building incorporates archival family records and photos with full documentation and sources, so that these records can be accessed by the public. Ultimately, I'd like to allow the community researchers to become members of the site so that they can see calculated relationships, navigate with more ease, participate in comments sections to build on the research, etc. I am not going to allow members to edit the tree because the material is carefully controlled from archival records and that is an important factor in this presentation; however, members will be welcome to use the comments sections to provide feedback and research direction for which they will be credited.
I have had one concern about opening the site up to allow memberships. I can control their ability to edit the tree, but not their ability to edit the photos. I totally understand and love the option to have members "tag" photos; however, I think that just like the ability to control tree editing there should be an opportunity to control photo editing. In this case, the photos are from archival sources and I need to control their information as I do the tree data. I want members to be able to contribute via comments sections just as I do within the tree, but I don't want to allow tagging on their end.
In english, when the parents of two people are siblings they are called 1st cousins (niece/nephew).
Further down the tree relatives can be called 2. cousin, 3. cousin and so on. This is well explained at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin
However, in countries like Norway and Sweden there are different terms for the very same relationships.
As example, what is in english called a "2. cousin" is in Swedish called "Tremänning" or a "Syssling". In the same matter, Norwegians would call a 2. cousin, a "Tremenning". The swedish wiki has a good overview over this at http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kusin
Now here is the problem with Family Tree Builder, there are no way for us to translate this properly. The strings that can be translated looks like:
"Cousin F", "%2 is a %3 cousin %4 of %1"
It will as example look like
"NN is a 2nd cousin of NN"
For us, it is simply the wrong term. We would call this person Tremenning
"NN is a Tremenning of NN"
Without proper support for these translations, a very basic part of relationship terms within Family Tree Builder are simply missing.
I hope this issue will be adressed now that the 7.x version are released and development of this are developed.
Hi there, is there any chance that I could export events in calendar (birthdays, marriage, etc.) into a file that I could import into Outlook - or even better - get it as a "live link" showing in Outlook (so that when someone add any data such as birthday these will automatically show up in my desktop calendar)??? Now I have to do it all manually... Thanks in advance for your reply!!!
Sometimes ago I had asked if it was possible to add a live online chat and Video conference option just like the Facebook have at the moment. Any idea when you are going to add this option on the MyHeritage Family website? All the members on my Family website are asking me to have this options available so they can chat and see each other while talking about the family and working together as team.
Looking forward for Live Chat and Video Tool as soon as possible.