В мобильном приложении на андроид 4.4.4 не отображается моё фамильное дерево
1. Я вошёл под правильным логином
2. При входе онлайн, через браузер Google Chrome персонального компьютера на Windows 10, Под тем же логином я вижу своё дерево, а через мобильное приложение не вижу
In the mobile application on Android 4.4.4 is not shown my family tree
1. I entered under the correct login
2. When entering online through the Google Chrome browser on a Windows personal computer 10, under the same login, I see my tree, and in the mobile application can not see
1. I get a little tired of having to click twice to confirm a Smart Match. Every time I click on "Yes confirm this match" a window comes up asking me if I want to invite the other tree owner, and to confirm. I never do anything other than click confirm, but it's annoying having to do this every time. I have a lot of matches to get through as I have got quite a long way back in my tree so there are obviously a lot of matches.
2. Similarly, when I decide to ignore a tree (which I do if there's been no activity on it in the last year), then I have to click on a window to confirm (which is fine), but then I get ANOTHER window with a Notice telling me that I've chosen to ignore that tree and which I have to click to continue. Well, I KNOW I've chosen to ignore that tree as I've just confirmed it. It's just another click I have to make, again when there are a lot of them to do. It's tiresome and unnecessary.
3. When I eventually DID want to invite someone to join my tree, after they contacted me, I couldn't find a way to do it. It's probably there somewhere but it's not obvious. In the end I asked them to go to my tree and request access.
4. I'm not sure if this functionality is available, but it would be nice to find how two people in a tree are related. I'm in touch with someone who's distantly related, and we're going to meet up soon, but I can't remember which part of the tree he's related to and where our common ancestor lies, without having to trawl through the tree to find it. It would be nice to be able to type in his name and mine and find the common connection easily.
Oh and another one I forgot. Again, not sure if this is available somewhere, but it would be nice to be able to set a parameter on the system so that it automatically ignores Smart Matches from trees where there's been no activity earlier than a certain time ago, e.g 12 months.
Yes I agree there's a danger of missing some information. So I do take a brief look at what it's matched. 90% of the time it's my tree which has more information than theirs, and the person that's matched has come up again and again on other matches. So I take the view that there's unlikely to be anything further forthcoming from that particular tree.
Thank you for your support. It might not be hard to implement a simple version of this idea. As a starting point it might only be a matter of making the "PEOPLE" listing sortable by "date added". This would give us a simple listing from youngest record to oldest record. This way everyone could see the latest editions.
Showing this list with the actual "date added" shown would be a bonus. But I would settle for just the ordered list if that could be implemented quickly and easilty.
Improving the weekly mail out list to report ALL additions - or a much fuller list - would still be a welcome and very nice addition when time permits.
The much bigger dream would be to know who make each update or correction. I imagine this would be a bit harder to implement. It would be ideal to know "last modified" and "by who". That would be the complete deal.
The "What's new" (front page summary) and the weekly report summary only summarise the additions to the site. e.g. Stephen added Blah, Blah, Blah and 20 other people to the family tree".
Would it be possilbe please to improve this listing in the weekly summary and provide a fuller list of people who have been added to the site.
Alternatively, would it be possible to provide a link to a page that provides the full list of additional names.
A purpose of the weekly summary is to garner and report the latest additions, but too much of the interesting information is lost in the very brief summary. When people subsequently visit the site there is no easy way to deternine what is new or the extent to which any branch of the tree has been increased or decreased.
This makes life especially difficult for site managers, who can see (say 23) people have been added, but can't easily determine who they all are. The larger the site and the larger the number of contributors, the bigger the problem.
Please consider helping with this. Especially please consider any improvement that would make collaboration between multiple contributors easier - (for family sites like mine that have a number of family members collaborating and contribution).
"how hard would it be to implement a "date added" option" was not a complaint. It was just a question? On reflection "how hard would it be" might sound like a complaint, but it wasn't. My question was - in your personal opinion, would it be a hard thing to do - how hard?
I know the official line is - complex databases, thorough testing, lots of lead time, prioritized according to volume of requests, limited resources, can't do everything...
I'd be interested to know, what was the last change implemented by MH as a direct result of a suggestion made on this forum?