Thank you, Remo. I have a premium account and every time I tap something to see it I get a screen saying it will cost $9.98 to go further. i thought my account had access to everything. This is maddening.
Som du ser heter jeg Arnold Pétrié og min far Maurice Pétrié.Jeg har noen slektninger som heter Decostanzi med Arnold til fornavn.Min far kom til Norge i 1946 da var han 18 år gammel.Han var fra Dieppe.
How does the Discovery hub suppose to be working? Has anyone try to use it? Does it suppose to be working in the Premium-version? I manage couple times to get some new relatives from there, but not any more? It only offers possibility to upgrade to the Premium Plus-version!
I have a problem with the family tree members.
In one of family I created, it says 18 members, but I can see only 8.
I checked out all buttons, and if theres something to click, but nothing. (I know there's those little quares pink and blue to click but as you can see in the image, there's anything else. And I zoom in and out , look around.. nothing...
Where are gone my other members? Someone can explain? Thank you....
I have a fairly large and sprawling family tree. It is great for looking for new relations, new details, smart matches and Record matches. It is a Working tree.
But a lot of the people in it are too remote to be in my personal family tree.
So what I need is another tree, not connected to smart matches or anything like that. Like a book that has been proof read and revised and is ready for publication...
Ideas please, I am sure others are in the same situation. How do I start the new tree (can I select who I transfer to it or do I have to transfer the lot and delete all those I don't want in the final version?)
And technically how is best to do it? I am not very experienced with computers so what, basically, is the method; and what do I click on (!) to make it happen?
And then having started the new tree how do I transfer the desired new people and details as I acquire them in the working tree?
P.S. I would be delighted if MH could set this up for everyone; it's a concept that should be really popular. And it would open up their market; so far as I know no-one else offers anything like it. MH, please show this to your chief executive! G.
I have been working with family genealogy since early 1999 , and like you I have a large tree with many extended families.
I call it my speculative tree, actually it turns out to be a source tree. As I find and verify bloodlines, family members closely related to my core family then I transfer to my direct Maternal/Paternal tree. This one I will publish for the immediate family.
The source tree is public so everyone can take advantage of all my research, so it may help someone in their travels in the fog.
Never thought about incororpating something like that into a program. All I do is Just remove a direct line and work on it, then merge it back in. Requires a lot of back up to prevent contamination and corrupt data getting into the mix.
ok it cant be that unusual that a person changes surname several times (due to several marriages, or just "for fun"). How can that be handled?
The best thing iould be if every person had several surnames fields, (with connected date and reason for change fields) but now I can only find "name as married" name as unmarried" (only for women for some strange reason, men changes their familynames quite often to their wifes here in sweden) and "earlier name".
But if someone have been married 2 (or more) times? Or been married and then later created a new family name? Can this be filed somehow?
I realise it might not have been as common in the older days, but when tracking current relatives it would be very useful, since all kinds of name changes are pretty normal nowadays (at least here in sweden and scandinavia)
A related question: In Sweden it is not that uncommon (nowadays) that a husband takes his wife's name in marriage. But the fields for birth name vs married name only shows up for women. Is there a way to fix this?
(I know there are more name-options in FTB, but I'd really like to be able to do this on the web as well)
I think in tune with your cocept that the same applies for name variations.
One needs a "index name" becuse some family names are spelled many ways but they Doo come from the same root.
More needs to be explored on the NAMES issue and I support your concept.
I think you will find that you can have vary the default name for a male such that it CAN be varied as a marry name. it Does Exists 00 but I cant look right now. If you cant find it report back here and I WILL find it.