There are some people who insist that my sister belongs in their tree. I know it is my sister as they have our dads name and correct y.o.b. and they have our mums name. Unfortunately they have the wrong p.o.b. for my sister and no y.o.b. but they have given her a spouse b in 1723 and a daughter b in 1747 and they fail to see how utterly ludicrous it is. Or is it just me that thinks it is ludicrous?
"Genealogy, that ain't of use to me and my family our tree don't branch. Now get the kids honey I read the doc's sign wrong. Doc how ya spell gynocology."
BEN: my life is worser than yours... coz im married to a woman that has a 20 yr old daughter... my father married her... my wife's daughter became my mother and my father became my son. and my wife became the mother in law of my father.. and if they will have a child, im going to be the grandfather of my brother or sister...
Take care: software intended to convert a stack of facts into a cohesive commentary for a genealogy report can sometimes produce odd results, especially if the facts are entered inaccurately. The following is an illustration of just how wrong it could go (not using My Heritage, of course!):
"Albert Jones, born an apprentice cord-knotter in the county of Ethelbert and Edith Jones on the Middlesex of June, Islington, married his grandfather, Zebadiah Jones and his great-uncle Emelia (nee Northumberland & Durham), and became the mother of a cook (aged 59), a parlourmaid (aged 15), 14 Drovers Way, two labourers, 5 cows, a goat, several chickens, one of his brothers, and, later, the Navy, having been press-ganged on a visit to Portsmouth to purchase grain and HMS Victory. He lived to the ripe old age of several other notable seabattles, losing a leg at his Baptism in 1795".
I think I spotted the error in this - whoever heard of a "cord-knotter"?
)